longer.blue

The Shadow Board: A Tech Oligarchy’s Bid to Redefine Power By Monk March 28, 2025 In the dim glow of a Washington, D.C., gala on January 20, 2025, a photograph captured a moment that would soon ripple across the world: a cluster of tech billionaires, their faces alight with triumph, standing shoulder to shoulder at Donald Trump’s second inauguration. Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreessen—the titans of Silicon Valley—beamed alongside a newly elected Vice President J.D. Vance and a resurgent Trump. The image, dubbed “The Tech Oligarchs” by a breathless press, seemed to herald a new era. But behind the flash of cameras and the clinking of champagne glasses, a far more unsettling story was unfolding—one that threatens not just American democracy but the very concept of governance as we know it. Six months ago, a small team of researchers and journalists, under the banner of a project called RE-enlightenment, began to notice something peculiar. Trump’s second term, they observed, was not shaping up to be a mere sequel to his first. The rhetoric was sharper, the alliances stranger, and the pace of change dizzying. What began as a hunch soon metastasized into a sprawling investigation, one that mapped a network of billionaires, ideologues, and political operatives united by a singular, radical vision: to dismantle the United States as a democratic nation and reforge it as a corporate entity—a “US Corp”—ruled not by citizens but by shareholders. At its helm is not Trump, nor even Musk, but a shadowy figure whose influence has long been underestimated: Peter Thiel. This is not a conspiracy woven from whispers and half-truths. It is a plan laid bare by the actions, investments, and words of its architects—a plan that, if successful, could mark the end of the democratic experiment in America and set a precedent for a global reordering of power. Europe, with its high democratic standards, stands as the last bulwark against this siege. But as the first cracks of resistance appear, the question looms: Can it hold? The PayPal Mafia At the height of the dot-com bubble, when PayPal was founded by a group of young entrepreneurs later christened the “PayPal Mafia.” Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, David Sacks, and others built a company that would reshape online payments and forge a brotherhood of wealth and ideology. Many of these figures now orbit Trump’s administration—Musk as a vocal supporter, Sacks as an AI and crypto czar—yet their shared history runs deeper than Silicon Valley success. Many spent formative years in apartheid South Africa, a crucible of privilege and authoritarianism that left an indelible mark. Thiel, born in Germany in 1967, moved with his family to South Africa as a child, growing up in a society where racial hierarchy was law and dissent was crushed. Musk, born in Pretoria in 1971, came of age in the same milieu. The apartheid regime’s prime minister, John Vorster, openly admired fascist ideals—a worldview that, for some, seems to have lingered. After relocating to the United States in 1977, Thiel immersed himself in libertarian thought at Stanford University, where he founded the Stanford Review, a conservative newspaper that became a petri dish for radical ideas. By the time he launched PayPal, Thiel was already dreaming of a world unencumbered by government meddling—a vision that would evolve into something far darker. The sale of PayPal catapulted Thiel and his cohort into the stratosphere of wealth and influence. Investments followed: Thiel poured $500,000 into Facebook in 2004, advising Mark Zuckerberg until 2022; Musk founded SpaceX and later acquired Twitter/X; others, like Andreessen, built venture capital empires. But it was Thiel’s 2010 investment in Tlon, a startup led by Curtis Yarvin—known by his pen name, Mencius Moldbug—that hinted at the ideological undercurrent now driving this network. Yarvin, a software engineer turned philosopher, is the intellectual force behind the “Dark Enlightenment,” a neo-reactionary creed that rejects democracy in favor of a corporate monarchy. Thiel has called Yarvin his “most important connection,” and together they watched Trump’s 2016 victory from Thiel’s home, plotting a future few could yet imagine. The Dark Enlightenment and the Birth of “Caesarism” At the heart of this movement lies a chilling ideology. The Dark Enlightenment, articulated by Yarvin and amplified by thinkers like Nick Land, envisions a world where democracy is a relic, replaced by a system called “neocameralism”—or, as critics dub it, “neofeudalism.” In this model, the state is a corporation owned by shareholders—wealthy elites who hold voting shares proportional to their influence. These shareholders appoint a board, which in turn selects a CEO to maximize “long-term shareholder value.” Citizens? They’re reduced to “clients,” free to leave if dissatisfied but voiceless in governance. It’s a system that blends the efficiency of capitalism with the autocracy of a tsar, a hybrid RE-enlightenment has termed “Caesarism.” Thiel’s disdain for democracy is no secret. In a 2009 essay, “The Education of a Libertarian,” he wrote, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” lamenting the enfranchisement of women and the poor as obstacles to progress. Yarvin’s writings go further, weaving racism, xenophobia, and a nostalgia for slavery into the tapestry of his thought. While these elements shock, they’re secondary to the core aim: transferring power from the people to a technocratic elite. This vision has found fertile ground among the PayPal Mafia and their allies. Musk’s purchase of Twitter in 2022, rebranded as X, was a salvo in this war—a tool to control discourse and amplify their agenda. Andreessen’s 2023 “Techno-Optimist Manifesto” extolled technology as humanity’s savior, conveniently ignoring its potential for oppression. J.D. Vance, mentored by Thiel since a fateful 2011 speech at Yale, rose from law student to senator to vice president, a loyal executor of the plan. And Trump? He’s the charismatic frontman, wielding nationalism and “masculine maximalism” to rally the masses while the board pulls the strings. The Takeover Begins Trump’s 2024 victory was the tipping point. Backed by Musk’s wealth, Thiel’s strategy, and a coalition of tech CEOs, he swept into office with a mandate to “get things done by any means necessary,” as Axios put it. The network’s roles clarified: Trump and Musk as executors, Thiel and Yarvin as the intelligentsia, and a coterie of enablers—tech titans like Andreessen and Sacks—greasing the wheels. Within days of the inauguration, the pieces fell into place. The state of emergency, declared on January 20, 2025, was the first move—a pretext to dismantle democratic institutions. The Department of Justice, the FBI, and the State Department faced immediate purges, replaced by loyalists. Guantanamo’s expansion signaled a crackdown on dissent, while economic policy shifted to weaken federal power, ensuring dependency on the board. Land grabs accelerated—Musk’s Texas town, Zuckerberg’s Hawaiian bunkers, Flannery Associates’ California “utopia”—each a feudal fiefdom in the making. Internationally, the board’s ambitions unfurled. Praxis, a Thiel-backed project, aims to plant a “neo-Gilded” city in the Mediterranean by 2026, a beachhead for global expansion. Gaza, pitched as a real estate venture by Trump, is slated to become another corporate enclave, with Israel’s blessing. Taiwan’s chip technology, Greenland’s minerals, Panama’s canal—all are targets for extraction, not alliance. The West as a democratic bloc is dead; in its place rises a transactional “US Corp,” cozying up to authoritarians like Putin while bullying neighbors like Canada and Mexico. Europe’s Last Stand Europe watches this unraveling with growing alarm. The European Union, with its robust democratic norms, is the final obstacle to the board’s world domination. Yet the siege has begun. Hybrid warfare—covert agents, disinformation, economic pressure—seeks to fracture the EU from within. J.D. Vance’s February 14, 2025, speech at the Munich Security Conference, decrying Europe’s “censorship,” dripped with irony from a regime dismantling free speech at home. The US, plummeting to 55th in global press freedom rankings, has no moral high ground. The EU’s response must be swift and resolute. RE-enlightenment proposes a four-pronged strategy: rebuild the social model to inoculate citizens against oligarchic promises; unify defense, extending protection to Ukraine; centralize intelligence to root out foreign agents; and make the EU tangible to its people, restoring trust. Enablers—reformed decision-making, energy independence, advanced mobility, and accessible technology—must underpin this effort. Strategic issues like food security, housing, demographics, and borders demand equal urgency. Yet the clock is ticking. Francis Fukuyama, who once heralded liberal democracy’s triumph, now mourns its betrayal. NATO frays, allies dwindle, and democracy globally contracts. Europe cannot rely on a fractured US or a hesitant UK. It must forge a new Cold War stance—autonomous, allied with the willing, and unyielding in its values. The World at a Crossroads The tech oligarchs’ vision is no dystopian fantasy; it’s a blueprint in motion. If the US becomes “US Corp,” a shareholder-ruled entity, the ripple effects will be seismic. Democracy, already battered, could vanish beneath a tide of Caesarism, leaving citizens as mere clients in a corporate fiefdom. Europe’s resistance offers hope, but only if it acts with the clarity and courage this moment demands. In Washington, the gala lights have dimmed, but the board’s work has just begun. Peter Thiel, the puppet master in the shadows, watches as his decades-long gamble nears fruition. The question is no longer whether this network exists—it does—but whether the world can muster the will to stop it. For now, the siege is on, and the stakes could not be higher.